Skip to main content

The New Normal is Fostering Outstanding Innovation

In the first of our series of interviews with HR executives discussing the COVID-19 crises, we sat down (virtually…) with Adam Levy to discuss this topic from his perspective. As a key leader in a global market research company, Levy was able to provide insights on a macro level, as Nielsen is continuously tracking the impact of COVID-19.

Q: Can you describe how you realigned your TA operations in light of COVID 19?

A: We have refocused the team to focus on 1) ramping up workforce planning efforts, 2) focusing on understanding future needs and difficult to fill roles, and 3) building pipelines for those roles. 

As the team is working on new policies ahead of an eventual return to work and reopening of offices, we came to realize that companies cannot rush to get back to normal, because “normal” as we know it will no longer exist. We really need to be thoughtful in terms of what the new normal looks like”. That means being clear on essential vs. non-essential work, managing effective virtual orientation for new associates, and effectively recruiting in virtual format if you’re unable to have face-to-face contact. 

In summary, it is getting to quickly understand what the new normal looks like, and how to get there as efficiently as possible.

Q: How have new work from home practices impacted your operation? Moving forward, do you plan to keep or expand work from home options for employees?

A: Working from home has worked extremely well, in part due to the company’s already flexible work arrangements. I’ve seen the level of innovation and ingenuity really increase since COVID, we have learned that we are able to do things that we never thought that we could, smarter and faster. 

Q: What new technologies have you adopted due to Corona? 

A: Having an already virtual environment in place prior to the COVID-19 lockdown meant that we were already adept at conference technologies, such as Google Hangouts. In times like these, being innovative ahead of a crisis has enabled a seamless transition for a remote workforce. 

Q: Do you think your industry will be impacted positively or negatively from the crisis?

A: I think that every industry will be impacted by COVID, certainly from a financial perspective, and I believe that the long term impacts of COVID from an economic perspective are going to be significant. However, I tend to look at the glass as being half-full, and I do think that items like speed to innovation, ability to re-assess real estate strategies and footprints, and looking closely at essential vs. non-essential work is going to benefit industries across the board. I think that despite the obvious tragedies that come from a pandemic like this - there are going to be silver linings that come out of COVID-19 that are a bit more long-term.

Recovering from this crisis will not be easy. But smart leaders at top companies are focusing on how they can make their teams more efficient, and preparing to accommodate more flexible, virtual work environments. Innovation, along with the right technologies, will be key factors in adjusting to the “new normal” after COVID-19.


Popular posts from this blog

Why Men Still Get An Unfair Advantage Finding New Jobs

A large scale research of 10 million candidate profiles conducted by Talenya reveals why men still get an unfair advantage finding new job opportunities.  
It’s 2020, and women are still being paid 79 cents to the dollar as compared to men, with women making up only 40% of managers. Deep structural problems exist, starting with the hiring process. The problem is twofold - arising both from the way candidates are recruited as well as the presence of implicit bias when viewing candidates.

It isn’t that there aren’t qualified women in the pipeline, it’s that recruiters find and accept candidates who write resumes and professional networking profiles in a certain way -- the male way. Discrimination based on how people write their resumes is apparent in both human recruitment and improperly trained AI-powered recruitment systems. Amazon scrapped their recruiting AI after finding that there was gender bias, specifically related to certain language used by male candidates as opposed to female…

Why companies can't hire Data Scientists?

There are about 2,500 Data Scientists in Boston. displays 1,643 job listings for Data Scientists in Boston. That means that there are around 1.5 Data Scientist jobs per candidate. But not all Data Scientists in Boston are looking to switch jobs. According to data analyzed by my company, Talenya, only 227 of the 2,500 are likely to be open to new opportunities. That’s more than 7 jobs per candidate! This is what the “the war for talent” looks like and it gets worse.
Assuming you’re a small, growing company looking to hire Data Scientists in Boston, you will be competing for talent against giants like Amazon (123 openings), Pfizer (42 openings) and Biogen (35 openings).
While the small companies are willing to pay around $120,000 for a Data Scientist with a few years of experience, the big guys are willing to pay $160,000 - $230,000.  If you’re a Data Scientist, which job are you going to take?
What can the small companies do to attract Data Scientists? To start with, they must …

Are there good candidates in the market?

Are there good candidates in the market?
A recent study published by CB Insight indicates a number of common reasons that startups fail. The
 first and second are not surprising: 42% of startups close because they found no market for their products and 29% because they ran out of money. But the most solvable reason is the third: 23% of startups fail because of an inadequate team. Obviously, these companies didn’t put the right people in place to do the job that needed doing
Entrepreneurs set up a company, develop an amazing product which the market is waiting for, raise funding and yet, one out of four startups close because the team was not suited for the tremendous challenges entrepreneurs and startups face. So even while the 3rd most common reason startups fail can be attributed to not having the right team in place, the first two reasons can also be partially attributed to having the wrong people executing those tasks. It’s sort of obvious to me. Not having the right team is arguably …