Skip to main content

The Importance Of Evaluating AI Talent Sourcing Tools Now!

Gone are those days.....

when job seekers marched into offices with a printed resume in hand, when candidates were hired after completing handwritten applications in a waiting room, and when HR departments had to rely on the country club Rolodex of an industry headhunter to fill high level positions.


Here are the days...


when recruiters use technology to make their lives easier and more efficient...Online applications, search engines, scheduling assistants, applicant tracking systems, and keyword searches have become a way of life for talent acquisition managers.


So why is it still so hard to find the right candidates? and,


Why do you have such little time to focus on what you do best? That is, forging human connections with talent in order to woo the best and the brightest to your company.

The answer is that the tools that are common place today are antiquated and inefficient.

"LinkedIn and other recruiting sites rely on Boolean search, incomplete and outdated user generated content, and limited information regarding the willingness of passive job seekers to move".


Alternatively true AI sourcing tools promise recruiters more candidates, better qualified talent pools, and more time to engage the right prospects. Here’s why it is important to start evaluating these tools: 

  • Be the first to get great talent, others can't see
  • Boolean search and other tools are failing you
  • Bots and AI can do your dirty work
  • Hiring managers don't always articulate best
  • Boost your recruiting KPI's 


Be the first to get great talent
: SHRM reports that 83% of US employers rely on some form of AI technology in HR. The competition are using it. AI is becoming ubiquitous because it helps companies be more efficient and helps sourcers get the best talent. Using the AI tools are no longer optional to remain competitive. 

 

Boolean search is failing you: Using trial and error keyword searches in common recruiting tools like LinkedIn is costing recruiters time. Even when one gets the right combination, hours are spent parsing through non-prioritized lists of unqualified candidates. The ROI on sourcers time is poor when using these tools. AI tools can find the right candidates without keyword searching, and some even rank candidates to give concise, prioritized lists to save recruiters time. 

 

Bots and AI can do your dirty work: Congratulations! You have identified a hefty list of qualified candidates suited for interviews! Now you need to contact them all to see which prospects would be interested in a first interview. Tedious, repetitive tasks like this slow you down. Instead, they can be farmed out to engagement AI Bots, who will present recruiters with a neat queue of qualified candidates ready to move forward.

 

Hiring managers don't always articulate best: Hiring managers often aren’t entirely sure of what they may need in a role, and can give recruiters job descriptions that may be inaccurate or which may not reflect the realities of the talent pool. At the same time, they may blame recruiters for not providing them with candidates that have necessary skills not listed in their requirements. True AI tools don’t rely on keyword searches, and can learn the kind of talent needed for the job from human behaviors and thought patterns. This enables recruiters to find the right talent the first time. 

 

Find Hidden Talent: Common recruiting tools like LinkedIn use a single source of user generated profiles. That means that they can’t find candidates that aren’t on LinkedIn or miss skills not stated on LinkedIn, for example. They can’t know skills or changes in job titles if users have not updated their profiles. A good AI solution will find candidates from multiple sources, predict unwritten skills, and uses up to date information to deliver the right talent to recruiters.  


Recruitment is moving into the future, and choosing the right tools is how companies are able to survive and thrive. Human capital is the lifeblood of every organization, and finding the best people is becoming easier. AI tools can save recruiters time and help them locate talent more quickly. Savvy, rock star recruiters are using technology to help their organizations remain competitive. 

Comments

  1. Your contents are completely awesome and share worthy. I really appreciate your efforts that you put on this. Keep sharing. For more Online Applicant Tracking related information visit Sheehan Consulting, LLC

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why companies can't hire Data Scientists?

There are about 2,500 Data Scientists in Boston. Indeed.com displays 1,643 job listings for Data Scientists in Boston. That means that there are around 1.5 Data Scientist jobs per candidate. But not all Data Scientists in Boston are looking to switch jobs. According to data analyzed by my company, Talenya, only 227 of the 2,500 are likely to be open to new opportunities. That’s more than 7 jobs per candidate! This is what the “the war for talent” looks like and it gets worse.
Assuming you’re a small, growing company looking to hire Data Scientists in Boston, you will be competing for talent against giants like Amazon (123 openings), Pfizer (42 openings) and Biogen (35 openings).
While the small companies are willing to pay around $120,000 for a Data Scientist with a few years of experience, the big guys are willing to pay $160,000 - $230,000.  If you’re a Data Scientist, which job are you going to take?
What can the small companies do to attract Data Scientists? To start with, they must …

Are there good candidates in the market?

Are there good candidates in the market?
A recent study published by CB Insight indicates a number of common reasons that startups fail. The
 first and second are not surprising: 42% of startups close because they found no market for their products and 29% because they ran out of money. But the most solvable reason is the third: 23% of startups fail because of an inadequate team. Obviously, these companies didn’t put the right people in place to do the job that needed doing
Entrepreneurs set up a company, develop an amazing product which the market is waiting for, raise funding and yet, one out of four startups close because the team was not suited for the tremendous challenges entrepreneurs and startups face. So even while the 3rd most common reason startups fail can be attributed to not having the right team in place, the first two reasons can also be partially attributed to having the wrong people executing those tasks. It’s sort of obvious to me. Not having the right team is arguably …

Why Men Still Get An Unfair Advantage Finding New Jobs

A large scale research of 10 million candidate profiles conducted by Talenya reveals why men still get an unfair advantage finding new job opportunities.  
It’s 2020, and women are still being paid 79 cents to the dollar as compared to men, with women making up only 40% of managers. Deep structural problems exist, starting with the hiring process. The problem is twofold - arising both from the way candidates are recruited as well as the presence of implicit bias when viewing candidates.

It isn’t that there aren’t qualified women in the pipeline, it’s that recruiters find and accept candidates who write resumes and professional networking profiles in a certain way -- the male way. Discrimination based on how people write their resumes is apparent in both human recruitment and improperly trained AI-powered recruitment systems. Amazon scrapped their recruiting AI after finding that there was gender bias, specifically related to certain language used by male candidates as opposed to female…